|
The Off-Topic Lounge APPROPRIATE FAMILY-FRIENDLY TOPICS ONLY - READ THE RULES! This forum is for posting anything (excluding topics prohibited by the forum rules) that's unrelated to email. General discussions, in other words. |
|
Thread Tools |
28 Mar 2008, 03:37 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ohio
Posts: 73
|
That word , 'Terrorist'
Has that word, 'terrorist' ever been used in history before? I read in history books that there were anarchists before, but I never found any terrorists before. Can anyone come up with an explanation?
|
28 Mar 2008, 09:14 AM | #2 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,118
|
Ok, let's tread very carefully here as this board has a strict "No politics" rule.
Here's an interesting background to the word "terrorism":- Quote:
Again, remember the NO POLITICS and NO RELIGION rules |
|
28 Mar 2008, 09:49 PM | #3 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 1,561
|
I think Edwin's reference nails it. The anarchist seeks to overthrow (government or order) by violence; the terrorist seeks to create chaos via fear. One targets the state; the other targets the populace.
|
29 Mar 2008, 12:40 PM | #4 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,804
|
Not really, anarchism is a political philosophy, terrorism is a means to an end.
|
29 Mar 2008, 09:31 PM | #5 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,426
|
One person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter. This topic is unavoidably political.
|
30 Mar 2008, 04:01 AM | #6 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,873
|
Lets try and keep it calm though.. We have a nice quiet atmosphere here and we are all mature and should be able to discuss things w/o them blowing up right?
|
30 Mar 2008, 12:54 PM | #7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1
|
...and without them blowing us up.
|
30 Mar 2008, 01:11 PM | #8 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,873
|
Welcome to EMD....
I hope you like it here |
30 Mar 2008, 05:46 PM | #9 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,944
|
|
30 Mar 2008, 10:18 PM | #10 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,426
|
Yeah, but keeping on a purely linguistic level is a fantasy. The participants in the Boston Tea Party, from the perspective of some British of the time, were terrorists. From the perspective of pro-independence Americans of the time, they were freedom fighters. Patriots.
|
30 Mar 2008, 11:17 PM | #11 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,626
|
One have to be good at rhetoric to talk only formally about such sensitive matters. It feels like politics or ideology very easily. I fail to but ok me not good at rhetorics or spin.
I like that EMD has as little of politics as possible. such get nasty very fast. They have presidental fight in US now and for several month more. Such could fill pages of threads. So we better stop writing, gets out of hand. And besides, to use that word will target us as a hate site would it not. How subtle we try it could get misunderstood as implicit connotation to something else. I'm skeptical to all this. Would it not be best we delete the thread to not get EMD in trouble? I'm a pessimist when it comes to internet and security. I hope I am wrong though. |
30 Mar 2008, 11:55 PM | #12 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,426
|
Quote:
One thing I like about this particular site is that it generally focuses like a laser beam on e-mail. Controversies and heated discussions are limited to that (and to other things tech-related). |
|
31 Mar 2008, 12:04 AM | #13 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,626
|
The only "religious " fights we have here is about the pseudo religious love for Linux or Fastmail. But that is most likely taboo to admit. Such is holy.
|