![]() |
|
Email Comments, Questions and Miscellaneous Share your opinion of the email service you're using. Post general email questions and discussions that don't fit elsewhere. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Macao
Posts: 2,428
Representative of:
tls-mail.com |
Simple Mail Email Service
if you are looking for a simple but reliable email service, just check us:
https://simplemail.co.in/ Domain Expiry Date: 2032-10-01 And we don't log client's any info. By using the default webmail (squirrel) you can even disable cookie. feedback are welcome. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,218
|
Disabling cookies wouldnt be a good thing,then your session wont hold..... (You will have to keep logging in)
EDIT: Why do ya need a gmail account??? I dont have one and many do not ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Philippines
Posts: 929
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Philippines
Posts: 929
|
Quote:
![]() Does Simple Mail have POP3 access? Guessing it doesn't. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 5,002
|
From the registration page:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 142
|
I think this is html written by ai
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Macao
Posts: 2,428
Representative of:
tls-mail.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Macao
Posts: 2,428
Representative of:
tls-mail.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Macao
Posts: 2,428
Representative of:
tls-mail.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in between the bright lights and the far unlit unknown
Posts: 2,532
|
While I am not in favor at all of "big tech", I must say Gmail has been rock solid for the almost 20 years I've been using it. I would consider Gmail a truly reliable service. Not all "big tech" is bad per default.
![]() The ONLY thing I find annoying about Gmail, is that when you use it via the Gmail app on Android phones, you are also automatically logged in to other Google services such as YouTube. When I log into a webmail account, I prefer to be logged in only in that webmail account. However, when I log into Gmail via a browser on my laptop, it does not log me in automatically into other Google services, so alltogether it's OK ![]() Also, Gmail supports Yubikey, which I consider the best form of 2FA. Granted, Outlook supports it too, but I don't know if other huge providers do so. The spam filters of Gmail are also working very good, I rarely had any spam in my inbox, and very rarely a reliable email ended up in Spam per mistake. So big tech or not, Gmail is a very solid provider in my opinion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 5,002
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 142
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in between the bright lights and the far unlit unknown
Posts: 2,532
|
I try to avoid AI, although I realise there's no way to totally avoid it as it becomes omnipresent.
Let's just say I have more faith in apps or services made by humans. Also, I'd never write an email or text with AI. It takes all emotions out of it. Imagine a love letter, job application letter, etc written in AI? Where is the emotion in that? Even if I have to write in a language I speak well but not perfectly (such as French), I prefer writing myself with a few spelling mistakes here and there, instead of having AI writing it for me. So when it comes to apps, services online, etc ... I know avoiding AI totally is impossible, but the more human input the more I'll trust the app or service. Machines and technology are not flawless. I'm not saying humans are flawless, but I still have more faith in that. AI is after all very rapidly developing, but it's very frequent use is still relatively new, so I know there are still flaws in it (and probably that will never change). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 697
|
Not in my view.
How do you unambiguously define precisely how a program is meant to work, to an AI? You could argue that the only way to do that is by giving the AI a program to read that already does it ... Most people if writing instructions to the AI will not be precise / analytical enough in their natural language. Suppose the AI was trained on US English; will it also understand the exact same thing in other forms of idiomatic English? How do you check what it produced actually does what you want? Some of the problems I've seen include: code that would not work, won't compile, doesn't solve the stated problem but instead what the AI hoped you meant, mixes dialects of languages up. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 2,123
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|