|
The Technical Zone... The Geeky forum... Use this forum to discuss technical aspects of email, from authentication protocols to encryption. |
|
Thread Tools |
23 Aug 2016, 04:32 AM | #1 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,583
|
MX Records
Can multiple targets be used in MX records as a backup so that copies of all emails arrive at both destinations ?
ie: server-name1.service1.fu server-name2.service1.fu server-name1.service2.fu server-name2.service2.fu Thanks in advance |
23 Aug 2016, 05:35 AM | #2 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,944
|
No. Once a successful connection is made to one of the MX sites, no further deliveries are made.
|
23 Aug 2016, 05:36 AM | #3 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,583
|
|
26 Aug 2016, 12:21 PM | #4 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 263
Representative of:
EmailQuestions.com |
No, BUT, there is nothing stopping you from creating a service behind an MX record that routes copies of email to two or more "internal" destinations.
|
26 Aug 2016, 07:52 PM | #5 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,583
|
Quote:
Are you referring to services such as PoBox ? (which I just ditched as I couldn't justify spending on PoBox and FM). The |
|
27 Aug 2016, 04:49 PM | #6 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 8,926
|
You can set any alias at a Fastmail account to target one or more external email addresses. So you could set an alias to deliver to both your Fastmail account and several external email accounts.
But as pointed out before, a sending server only delivers an individual outgoing message once. If you want to get a message delivered to several destination servers, the only ways are:
|
27 Aug 2016, 09:20 PM | #7 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,583
|
Thanks for your reply Bill. I'm aware of the facts you mentioned. I originally relied on FM alone until the infamous downtime issues we all experienced. I then decided to bundle all my eggs into PoBox's basket as they seemed more reliable at the time. However, with the recent acquisition, I'm now unfortunately less confident in that fact and cannot justify paying for both services.
I'm interested to know what specific services popowich was thinking of? |
27 Aug 2016, 11:20 PM | #8 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,944
|
Of course I cannot speak for popowich but "mass forwarding to multiple addresses" is supported by quite a few email providers discussed here: Pobox, Fastmail, Runbox, EuMX &c.
BTW, a similar functionality is provided by most, if not all, domain registrars. |
28 Aug 2016, 04:27 AM | #9 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 263
Representative of:
EmailQuestions.com |
In that moment I had in mind that it's one of a few possible ways to handle some DR and business continuity types of requirements for incoming email since that's what the OP seemed to be leaning toward.
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|