|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
30 May 2010, 04:07 AM | #16 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 3,265
|
I could really use a small increase on my member account. Can I take some of that extra from my enhanced and put it into my member account? LOL It would seriously be nice though to see these older accounts get a little bit of attention too.
It's good to see the increases because I feel that Fastmail is keeping up with competition. Enhanced accounts are now much larger than Gmail accounts, plus with all the added benefits. There'd only be a few additions that would make Fastmail perfect right now. (I'm sure a lot of those things are on the recommended improvements threads) Let's hope the Opera folks can have the team implement them. |
30 May 2010, 10:16 AM | #17 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD (USA)
Posts: 835
|
I'm in the middle of rebuilding our home NAS to upgrade it from 800GB to 8TB, and there are only *five* of us using it. I'm looking forward to my kids no longer being able to scratch up, fingerprint, and slather foreign substances on our DVD collection
|
30 May 2010, 12:26 PM | #18 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1
|
Member Account
I am a little annoyed that they haven't increased the Member account storage. They can at least make it the same as the free account. After all we did pay, albeit small amount, to get the Member status...
|
30 May 2010, 01:09 PM | #19 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 895
|
I see my Family/Superior account now has 14GB mail storage, with mail bandwidth half that at 7GB. Conversely my file storage is only 6GB, but file bandwidth is twice that at 12GB.
I like to keep my old mail, but not even using half of the mail storage. Then again I have a family member who's consuming 3GB+ per month in email correspondence (and accelerating) -- even though he gets practically no spam or commercial mailing lists. I'm OK with the new smaller annual fee for additional storage, but I'm just as likely to stay put with my existing one-time-paid extra storage... Can I ask what kind of NAS machine you have? Is it a 4-bay unit populated with 2TB drives? Last edited by beq : 1 Jun 2010 at 02:51 AM. |
30 May 2010, 04:48 PM | #20 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 370
|
Well, I have FULL account and am just grateful for the added storage. We've been asking for it for a long time, so good on you FM/Opera and thanks! Of course you needn't stop there and don't forget what Gmail is dishing out free.
Hank |
30 May 2010, 07:20 PM | #21 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,583
|
definitely a welcome change when I noticed yesterday. Thanks FMopera!
|
30 May 2010, 09:04 PM | #22 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Selangor, Malaysia
Posts: 460
|
This is excellent. I finally get a refund from the storage that I bought before but never really used because I moved to my enhanced account. Another year of Fastmail Enhanced subscription for me.
|
31 May 2010, 08:33 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 81
|
Thank you Fastmail!
|
31 May 2010, 11:39 AM | #24 | |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD (USA)
Posts: 835
|
Quote:
Storage costs have dropped considerably over the past few years; The 2TB drives are only $30 more expensive than the 320GB drives I bought 3 years ago. FM's costs have also gone down, but they still have to manage the cost of supporting them, which has undoubtedly gone up. $4.95 per year for 1GB of extra storage isn't unreasonable though, and it's considerably more capacious than the 100MB increments they had been providing at a higher cost. Personally, I'd like to see FM/Opera do away with the split between mail and file storage and provide a single pool from which users can either use as needed, or allocate to mail or file storage as they see fit. It would take some rearchitecting on the back-end, but I think it'd be a great feature (and selling point). |
|
31 May 2010, 03:39 PM | #25 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 1,238
|
Mystakill wrote:-
Quote:
NJSS |
|
31 May 2010, 04:45 PM | #26 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Posts: 1,027
|
Very nice!
As far as I am concerned, 1 GB for my full account is now reasonable compared to 'the market' (i.e. price/quality tradeoff including all other fastmail features). The possibility to shift quotas around (across mailbox-file space) would make it top-notch, but no deal-breaker for me! |
31 May 2010, 05:10 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 166
|
Apple's MobileMe accounts have that feature, I have 10 GB of storage that I can split between file storage and mail.
One thing to consider here is the total amount of storage the we have with our FM accounts, if you simply add the mail and file allocations together and multiply by the number of users that FM have then you have a very large storage requirement. I'm guessing that the mail storage is really a pool that your account can grow into with the upper limit being set at your account quota. I'm currently pushing the limits with a whopping 1% of usage which means that the remaining 99% would be available for other users, it's not real dedicated storage or likely to be used by most. I also use IMAP which means that I would need the same amount of free space at my end which is why I keep my mail paired down, I have started setting up auto purge to delete old email. File storage is a different matter, since I don't need to keep a local copy I will tend to store more, I also use it for photos, file downloads and temporary storage. This could be a pool at FM's end but would need more real storage available. What I'm trying to say is that I think it will be more than a change to their backend to give us an account where we can change the allocation between files and mail, it could be that we end up with less combined storage to achieve it. Just my thoughts. Regards Alan |
31 May 2010, 05:33 PM | #28 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Posts: 1,027
|
You don't necessarily need the same amount at your local computer, because in most email clients (e.g. Apple Mail, Thunderbird) you can specify whether you want to locally cache/store emails. The downside is that searching through your mails (with spotlight for example) might be less thorough though.
|
31 May 2010, 06:02 PM | #29 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,944
|
For the record: official announcement
|
31 May 2010, 08:24 PM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
Regards Alan |
|