|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
16 Dec 2004, 09:25 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 117
|
For everyone's benefit... (Sieve / Plus Addressing)
There are a lot of queries regarding Duplicates when the mails are redirected... I am not sure if everyone has a solution now...
After a lot of R&D, I think I have found a solution. (As of now, it is working perfectly.. but I dont know for how long it will work) With This, You CAN:
You can use the following Quote:
The important line is the one in bold... It makes sure that plus addressing (Folder name fileinto is properly addressed esp if you have a domain) |
|
16 Dec 2004, 10:19 PM | #2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The line in bold fails (unless you have a * folder!?) and directs the message to your inbox.
What do you mean by "duplicates"? Forwarding messages twice or duplicates in the FM account? |
16 Dec 2004, 10:36 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 117
|
The line in bold doesnt fail. I am using it quite well...
Quote:
What I mean by duplicates is... When a mail is sent to example.one@mydomain.com (with plus addressing and redirected to another email, A copy is 1. filed in Inbox 2. filed in example.one folder 3. forwarded to 'another' email account. Read this http://www.emaildiscussions.com/...threadid=27294 |
|
16 Dec 2004, 11:10 PM | #4 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,135
|
Guest, Member, higher level needed for this?
Is this for the two highest level of service then?
trew |
16 Dec 2004, 11:17 PM | #5 | |||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I didn't mean "fails to achieve the desired effect", BTW - I was referring to the folder name being invalid. Quote:
Quote:
Trew: you must have a Member (or higher) account to be able to manually edit your script. |
|||
16 Dec 2004, 11:29 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 117
|
level...
you need to be 'member' or higher to access sieve...
|
16 Dec 2004, 11:42 PM | #7 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 2,978
|
I'd have to agree with Daniel. It would be great if fileinto "INBOX.*" works the way we want it to, it would make many people's lives (or at least their Sieve) more convenient Perhaps when Sieve variables extension gets implemented?
|
17 Dec 2004, 12:29 AM | #8 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,804
|
The duplicate problem is due to the way that fastmail creates sieve from the basic rules page. If you write your own sieve you can simply choose to do it a different way.
|
17 Dec 2004, 02:00 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
Quite true. I am not sure when the sieve variable will get implemented. As of now, the above "Inbox.*" is working for me but only if you are use "matches" as part of the condition. I have been wracking my brains for a solution for a long time... and almost tried everything said on this forum. I think this is as close as I wanted the sieve to be. And yes, I have an enhanced account. |
|
17 Dec 2004, 02:03 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
I hope all this helps users on this forum. |
|
20 Dec 2004, 09:09 AM | #11 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,804
|
Quote:
keep causes a copy to go where +folder addressing would have put it. Fastmail's basic rules generate a keep next to the redirect, which is hit even when a filing rule is also hit, causing duplicates. The problem is that it is not possible to get a keep from fastmails filing rules - only a fileinto "inbox", which isn't the same. The solution you posted is a solution to a problem that doesn't actually exist when you write your own sieve. The thread you quoted was originally about basic rules, not sieve. |
|