|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
8 Apr 2006, 10:17 AM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 99
|
Yes yes yes that all makes sense and you must feel very proud at being so sensible and logical.
The reason I'm confused is that there is a monthly charge for those extra things (or rather, there was), but it seems to be charged all up front. I'm ok with that practically, but is it conceptually still a monthly charge? If it is, then maybe the remaining months should be credited. If it is conceptually a YEARLY lump sum thing calculated per month, then the pricing plan should reflect that, and instead of saying $1/mth, it should say $12/yr for example. |
8 Apr 2006, 10:20 AM | #32 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,426
|
Quote:
|
|
8 Apr 2006, 10:37 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 142
|
This is fantastic news and I hate to nitpick but with 6 aliases and 10 poplinks having only 8 personalities is woefully inadequate for full customers. Just moving it up to 15 would probably help a lot of people out right now.
|
8 Apr 2006, 10:50 AM | #34 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
|
|
8 Apr 2006, 12:13 PM | #35 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 895
|
Hey, I counted that we've paid $800-900 thus far to add extra mail storage to my family's various Enhanced accounts.
(In contrast, I think we've only paid less than a couple of hundred dollars so far for other add-ons such as extra bandwidth, virtual domains, aliases, SMS credits, etc.) So yes, I would also feel sad when (if?) FM lowers their extra storage one-time fees. Especially since most of the other FM accounts are only relegated as backup archives now. Truthfully I didn't really need to store a copy of everything in these FM accounts (which require extra storage), but I had been too impulsive (or rather, obsessive) |
8 Apr 2006, 02:06 PM | #36 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA-South Carolina
Posts: 503
|
Wow--my full account now has *more* aliases that I wasn't aware of, until I happened to have time to stop by, and just happened to read this thread.
Sure wish there were *some* way that FM could notify us of changes via email, as I have mine set to "chatty", but very very seldom get anything from FM, when there are changes. OTOH,,,I'm certainly not complaining about the new increase of aliases, including one that can have only 2-4 characters. ~Diane |
8 Apr 2006, 02:37 PM | #37 | |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
Quote:
The good news is that Tuffmail have grandfathered my account (although it is not available to new customers) I can renew for $15.95 a year, when my account next becomes due. IMO, Fastmail should have adopted a similar plan - the bottom line - it is not a good idea to upset your (existing) good customers. |
|
8 Apr 2006, 02:55 PM | #38 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VK4
Posts: 3,029
|
Just enjoy it..... whats a few bucks in a life time.
|
8 Apr 2006, 03:07 PM | #39 | |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
Quote:
|
|
8 Apr 2006, 08:51 PM | #40 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,102
Representative of:
Fastmail.FM |
There is only 1 situation where people are worse off. Full accounts who had 1 extra virtual domain + < 5 virtual aliases. All other cases are better off.
So the only thing we could have grandfathered was somehow allowing those people to pay for full + 1 domain + < 5 virtual alaises, and keep what they had. This was literally only about 20 people, and would have been a huge complexity to do just for the 20 people. Apart from aligning better with other providers in the market, one part of the reasons for what we did was to remove internal complexity on the whole calculation of extra alias costs to go with the subscription costs. This now makes the renewal cost one fixed amount for all people. Basically what I'm trying to say is that we understand grandfathering, but we believed that this issue affected sufficiently small number of people, and the cost difference was sufficiently small to not justify the required complexity. I'm sure some of the people that were affected don't agree, but it's a decision we decided to make, I'm sorry if you feel high aggreived by it. Obviously that wasn't our intention. Rob |
8 Apr 2006, 08:53 PM | #41 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,102
Representative of:
Fastmail.FM |
DianeB: I'm planning on sending out a newsletter soon to let everyone know of the changes.
Hadaso: Thanks for the pointers, I'll fix them up soon. FYI, when you move from a link down onto the area that popped up, it should stay there, it should only disappear when you move off the link and off the area that popped up... Rob |
9 Apr 2006, 12:05 AM | #42 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 4,259
|
Quote:
|
|
9 Apr 2006, 04:27 AM | #43 |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA Northwest
Posts: 3,849
|
Pricing Table comments
The feature list has been one of the most poorly written things forever, and I welcome a rewrite. What you have is an improvement.
I think most sites display a feature grid like this with a fixed layout instead of using CSS or HTML that resizes as the window does. I think it's better to have you absolutely control this page so it makes the best possible presentation. This is a marketing tool and I think it is still a bit unsightly. Rolling over/Clicking the links at the left does nothing but go to the top of the page (I have disallowed scripting). When I allow it I understand what you intended. Would printing display the additional information for any or all of the items on the page? It appears not to be available unless I turn off scripting, reload the page before printing. I recommend WHITE background with clear grid dividers for legibility. Also the current gridline is invisible on my print preview. Wouldn't you dare to create another one of these as a comparison table? I think you should put the Full account and Enhanced in a table against the Yahoo $20 account -- for better or worse, your Full account compares closely to it. Put in a few others too. I think you can show your strength. [edit: FROM ADDRESS -- this feature is critical to me and you don't clearly show that we have unlimited/unrestricted use of the From Address. I recommend it be in the table distinctly different from Personalities. For example, anyone shopping for that feature will think FM only supports 3 From addresses at a Member level when that is not correct.] Last edited by Shelded : 9 Apr 2006 at 04:45 AM. |
9 Apr 2006, 04:32 AM | #44 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA Northwest
Posts: 3,849
|
Quote:
Regarding the change: I have a Full account which will be quite happy since it needed more aliases but uses no domains since the domains go through my Enhanced account. I'm quite happy with this news. |
|
9 Apr 2006, 04:50 AM | #45 | |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 516
|
Quote:
|
|