King Kong

unhappysoul · 20 Dec 2005, 01:50 PM

Too long...

I think movie was like 3 hours long. ( Went in to see movie
at 11:40 and came out at 3:20AM )

and first two hours were about long for girl.

and too many un called for type of scenes..

too many scenes about super sized bugs eating people or runnnig around .

too many T-raks runnig around scene.. felt like I was watching that one moive about Lost in middle of earth..

and rest of the movie was compress into about 40 min or so.... even my wife thought it was boring..

BUT chronicle of natina(?) was very good

btn · 21 Dec 2005, 08:19 AM

Indeed, The Return Of The King is a much more entertaining three-hour Peter Jackson movie.

metal · 21 Dec 2005, 06:07 PM

For some reason, I cannot tolerate movies like King Kong, Lord of the Rings, Matrix, Harry Potter etc. for more than 2 minutes.

Starion · 26 Dec 2005, 11:42 AM

Wow, I did not know that Peter Jackson's King Kong is three hours long. Wow. The original 1976 version was about two hours and 15 minutes long.

I might go see The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe instead. Thanks for the suggestion unhappysoul!

Bamb0 · 30 Nov 2022, 08:36 AM

Yes and the original is much better than this newer trash is!!

I love the original king kong!!

webecedarian · 3 Dec 2022, 12:04 PM

Did you not notice how old this thread was? It's not like he'll be seeing your reply.

Bamb0 · 4 Dec 2022, 09:23 AM

No but it doesnt matter,its still a good thread and newer members can see it

20 Dec 2005, 01:50 PM	#1
unhappysoul Cornerstone of the Community Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Los Angeles, California Posts: 504	King Kong Too long... I think movie was like 3 hours long. ( Went in to see movie at 11:40 and came out at 3:20AM ) and first two hours were about long for girl. and too many un called for type of scenes.. too many scenes about super sized bugs eating people or runnnig around . too many T-raks runnig around scene.. felt like I was watching that one moive about Lost in middle of earth.. and rest of the movie was compress into about 40 min or so.... even my wife thought it was boring.. BUT chronicle of natina(?) was very good

21 Dec 2005, 08:19 AM	#2
btn Cornerstone of the Community Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: San Jose, CA, US Posts: 688 Representative of: Everyone.net	Re: King Kong Indeed, The Return Of The King is a much more entertaining three-hour Peter Jackson movie.

21 Dec 2005, 06:07 PM	#3
metal Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Chair Posts: 115	For some reason, I cannot tolerate movies like King Kong, Lord of the Rings, Matrix, Harry Potter etc. for more than 2 minutes.

26 Dec 2005, 11:42 AM	#4
Starion Essential Contributor Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Washington D.C. Posts: 240	Wow, I did not know that Peter Jackson's King Kong is three hours long. Wow. The original 1976 version was about two hours and 15 minutes long. I might go see The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe instead. Thanks for the suggestion unhappysoul!

30 Nov 2022, 08:36 AM	#5
Bamb0 Master of the @ Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: USA Posts: 1,808	Yes and the original is much better than this newer trash is!! I love the original king kong!!

3 Dec 2022, 12:04 PM	#6
webecedarian Essential Contributor Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: NYC Posts: 472	Did you not notice how old this thread was? It's not like he'll be seeing your reply.

4 Dec 2022, 09:23 AM	#7
Bamb0 Master of the @ Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: USA Posts: 1,808	No but it doesnt matter,its still a good thread and newer members can see it