![]() |
|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#16 | |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
Perhaps by now enough legacy Fastmail.ca users have migrated over that it makes more sense to have the primary MX records pointing to the "real" FastMail, and send anything that doesn't match back to the old Fastmail.ca servers. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 8,677
|
I wish that we had some fastmail.ca users posting here to tell us what's happening for existing users.
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 368
|
Yeah, me too. It does make me curious, as Fastmail.ca gave away free accounts at one point, and promised that the accounts would remain free indefinitely:
Quote:
Quote:
What's interesting, however, is that it looks like FastMail is already using a virtual user table on the main messagingengine servers, rather than just handing all unknown @fastmail.ca addresses over to the old FastMail. I did a quick test, and any unknown @fastmail.ca addresses are rejected in the same way that they would be for any other FastMail-owned domain (I just telnetted to port 25 and had an SMTP chat with in1-smtp.messagingengine.com). This means that either everybody from the old Fastmail.ca has already migrated/expired or FastMail has an address table of remaining fastmail.ca users. This means there are no technical reasons why they couldn't make Fastmail.ca available as an alias for the rest of us, but perhaps there's a "cooling off" period in there somewhere too just to make sure that old fastmail.ca addresses don't get recycled too quickly. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,479
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|