|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
20 Oct 2007, 11:05 AM | #16 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VK4
Posts: 3,029
|
Yes something like that would be nice but I feel we are stuck with it.
|
20 Oct 2007, 01:31 PM | #17 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,015
|
I love the idea of the dancing gif. That would be ideal
If not that, I do think the loading page should at least be formatted to look like the main FM interface. Get some blues going or something. |
20 Oct 2007, 06:39 PM | #18 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VK4
Posts: 3,029
|
I cant understand why it has made it slower to load, but testing fastmail, gmail and mail snare they are all about the same now....so its not really fastmail anymore
|
20 Oct 2007, 08:52 PM | #19 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,583
|
|
21 Oct 2007, 02:51 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 77
|
Agree... why the redirect?
I've never felt that it was slow, but now that it's redirecting it does *feel* slower, even if it's not.
I'd rather sit in anticipation as my spinning firefox flower-thingy tells me fastmail is loading. This seems clunky. Thanks. <M> |
21 Oct 2007, 03:23 AM | #21 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,060
|
I find this extra screen to be annoying - both the one on the beta and the one on the production server. I hope FM will abandon this "improvement".
Prog. |
21 Oct 2007, 03:46 AM | #22 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 204
|
I sort of dislike being critical, but I must admit that I agree with the sentiments above. The extra screen is a bit annoying and I do hope that there is someway that Fastmail can discard the extra screen.
|
21 Oct 2007, 07:47 AM | #23 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 49
|
Additional Page with Login
Per
Quote:
Which would be an improvement for especially new users that were not aware that folders created in an email client had to be synced in the web interface by going to: Options, Folders, Update, Done for those folders to appear in the web interface. Yes, it would be nice if the change wasn't so obvious but I appreciate the endeavor. |
|
21 Oct 2007, 09:51 AM | #24 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
<M> |
|
21 Oct 2007, 10:00 AM | #25 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
Rob ?? 'No web interface folder refresh' Option ? |
|
22 Oct 2007, 02:28 AM | #26 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,861
|
If possible, it might be a good idea to set some internal 0/1 variable to 1 if a user creates a folder using a client. Then at next webmail login, if that variable is a 1, the folder refresh takes place, and the variable is reset to 0. If the variable is 0, no refresh occurs. It seems to be a very large use of cpu resources to refresh every account at every login.
|
22 Oct 2007, 03:08 AM | #27 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 8,687
|
Quote:
Sherry |
|
22 Oct 2007, 03:42 AM | #28 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,861
|
Quote:
Added: actually this would be necessary for folder creation/deletion/renaming/movement -- any change to the folder structure. Last edited by zhak : 22 Oct 2007 at 04:10 AM. |
|
22 Oct 2007, 06:37 AM | #29 | |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 370
|
loading
Quote:
Hank |
|
22 Oct 2007, 06:40 AM | #30 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,583
|
Quote:
|
|