|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
30 Apr 2010, 11:01 PM | #106 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 19
|
Sad news indeed, I've been with fastmail for a long time and now it's gone. I've no interest at all in Opera as a browser or as a company that I want to deal with, so now I'm off as soon as I can make new arrangements.
Bloody nuisance as I've got about 5 years of archived emails that I'll need to migrate to Google Apps and I don't even like the way google does IMAP. To top off the bad news I've just discovered that my domain hosting service has stuffed up my account and I'm not currently authorised to make changes to my domain DNS server settings. |
30 Apr 2010, 11:06 PM | #107 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
|
30 Apr 2010, 11:12 PM | #108 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Greenbelt, MD (USA)
Posts: 1,278
|
Well, like a few others, this is my first post in a while. The only thing I can't seem to figure out is what functionality/features will I lose? If somebody can point me to a link and/or show me, that would be great. Specifically:
* Folders/personalities -- when I'm in FolderA, it uses PersonalityA when I compose a message. FolderB uses PersonalityB, etc. * Ordering folders -- my most frequently used folders are at the top. * Hiding folders -- I prefer "hidden unless unread" feature for several folders * Lots of other features that are unique to FM. Really nice feature: subdomain addressing. I use this to assign a unique email addr when I have to register somewhere: * Amazon Books = amazon AT myuserid DOT fmdomain DOT tld * EBay = ebay AT myuserid DOT fmdomain DOT tld etc, etc I'm not as concerned who is going to own it as much as what changes will occur. And like others, I have always liked the quick response of the FM folks. |
30 Apr 2010, 11:18 PM | #109 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ultima Thule
Posts: 1,657
|
|
30 Apr 2010, 11:20 PM | #110 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 327
|
I can't say that I am dismayed, mostly because Opera has been one of the less evil corporations out there, but I do have some concerns.
The current team has been very responsive to user needs and issues. 1. Are they being retained? 2. Will the practice continue? 3. Will fasmail.fm operate semi-independently (as a subsidiary) or will it be fully assimilated? |
30 Apr 2010, 11:25 PM | #111 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gator Country (Florida)
Posts: 136
|
Quote:
I don't really mind the switch. It was inevitable. I just wonder how it will affect the unique way I use FM. |
|
30 Apr 2010, 11:27 PM | #112 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 6
|
What does "acquired by law" mean?
The new user agreement says
Quote:
|
|
30 Apr 2010, 11:36 PM | #113 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: France
Posts: 229
|
|
30 Apr 2010, 11:41 PM | #114 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2
|
Just as I moved from Gmail literally 4 days ago. Still in the honeymoon phase with Fastmail. What gives?
|
30 Apr 2010, 11:42 PM | #115 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1
|
Kind of sad
I have been with Fastmail since 2002 and I have really loved that it was small and had amazing customer service. I didn't really recognize how special it was and how much love I had for it until today upon hearing this news.
There's no where else I want to go. I am going to stick with it and see what happens. It feels kind of like when losing an old friend. Matt |
30 Apr 2010, 11:52 PM | #116 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ultima Thule
Posts: 1,657
|
Quote:
I for one would love to know how much FM actually cost. Is it likely that this information will be disclosed? |
|
30 Apr 2010, 11:57 PM | #117 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Twickenham, UK
Posts: 1,306
|
Quote:
http://www.opera.com/company/investors/ |
|
30 Apr 2010, 11:59 PM | #118 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 16
|
Personally, I find this a bit disheartening since I am new to Fastmail (about 1 week now) and bought 3 years of service for me and my spouse. So I now have 2 accounts that if I cancel I lose all the money I just paid.
I think if you cancel you should get back your money (prorated of course), but I find it disingenuous when they clearly knew before they made their most recent offer to get people to sign up. I would cancel and walk away but I am also out $80.00 if I do after 1 week of use (my spouse has yet to use it). Not very happy with this treatment. Like others FM seems to be about the bottom line even when they knew this was coming to take people's money. I would go back to Netaddress in a heartbeat now, but it stinks paying this company $80.00 for service I would never get use of personally. I am not sure if I can dispute this legally with my CC company and not pay for the recent charges and cancel my service. |
30 Apr 2010, 11:59 PM | #119 | |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 370
|
Quote:
|
|
1 May 2010, 12:01 AM | #120 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
|
Hi everyone! This is my first post without a "representive of: fastmail" tag attached to me!
All the full-time staff have been retained (I haven't been operationally involved in FastMail for a few years - just a bit of advisory stuff here and there). Personally, I'm no longer officially connected with the company. Some comments on the various stuff mentioned so far in this thread: I understand that people would have liked some warning, but that wasn't an option - everyone was under strict NDAs. So, sorry but we had no choice but to spring this on you! The recent change of the TOS to reflect "FastMail Partnership" rather than "FastMail Unit Trust" has nothing to do with this - it happened over a year ago before any discussions with Opera started. The new owner of FastMail is "Opera Australia", as the email sent to everyone mentioned. This is an Australian company. So I don't see that anything has changed in terms of legal jurisdiction (although I'm not a lawyer, so take that with a grain of salt!) It seems to me then that with all the same full-time staff, and the same legal jurisdiction, there's not really much reason to expect to see substantial changes in how things run. I would think that Opera wouldn't spend money buying the business if it wasn't going to try really hard to keep the current customers happy! The big change, in my opinion, is that FastMail is now backed by a much bigger, richer, company... Which should mean more features, and more security. (The above is all just my opinion - not an official comment from FastMail, of course.) |