![]() |
|
|||||||
| Fastmail.FM Help and Current Issues This forum is for users to help each other to solve any problems they are having using FastMail.FM. It's also the place to discuss problems such as outages, slowness or other similar issues. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Cal-e-for-nia
Posts: 361
|
Looking for a way to disable wrap
I do all my sending via the web interface at FM and am an enhanced user. Would like to know how to set the wrap feature on sent mails to 100 characters or better. I only send in text, but it seems the person that's receiving this email is getting the message text wrapped after 80 characters or so. The emails I am sending are data to input into a program and they don't want to fool around with cleaning it up.
I went into the Options>Preferences>Compose but I don't see anything to suggest line length or word wrap. Suggestions anyone? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fastmail won't wrap lines if the first character is '#'. Or you could send the code as an attachment.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Cal-e-for-nia
Posts: 361
|
Does the # stay in the data? Couldn't have that.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes, it stays. Any text editor (including MS Word) can be used to remove the '#' column.
There is an alternative: compose the message in HTML, and use the <PRE> tag. previous discussion |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 82
|
Re: Looking for a way to disable wrap
You just stumbled on the biggest shortcoming of FM - being unable to determine the wrap length on the browser interface.
I send email after email to people with 1024x768 (or more!) resolution and 20% of the their screen contains a wrapped email from me. That's so poor FM! Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Cal-e-for-nia
Posts: 361
|
The previous discussion pointed to by Daniel S won't work[discussing the <PRE> HTML command] because I use text only and this is for HTML. Also the # won't work because editing at the receiving end would still be necessary.
I found a way around it and it is not through FM. I am using Pocomail with which you can set the point at which the text wraps. I don't think Poco is unique as I've found how to do it with Outlook Express and Thunderbird. It is something FM ought to look into though. This means I can't use the FM web interface for this operation. I had so hoped to get away from email apps. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 303
|
Quote:
Even if it is not a human processing task, a little parsing program can do the job. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 156
|
this is the WORST thing about fastmail. please fix it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 65
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 82
|
I couldn't agree more. All the time put in on ftp and webdav when all FM emails look awful because of the wrapping. People that have their monitor resolution up at 1280 only have ***1/4*** of their screen filled with email when they read one of my emails.
Honestly, how long would it take to put it user option to offer a different wrapping????? If Fastmail will send me the code, I'll do it for them. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,098
Representative of:
Fastmail.FM |
This is really about the history of email. Text emails are supposed to be wrapped at around the 80 column mark. From the official RFC on email:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html --- 2.1.1. Line Length Limits There are two limits that this standard places on the number of characters in a line. Each line of characters MUST be no more than 998 characters, and SHOULD be no more than 78 characters, excluding the CRLF. --- Now if you go and look at the defition of SHOULD: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt --- 3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course. --- You can probably argue that "I have a special case", and it would be good in those special cases to allow non-wrapping mode, but I wish there was an easy way to enable/disable it. So basically the answer probably is: 1. We're not going to by default stop wrapping at the 72 character mark. We've found that in most circumstances this provides the best interoperability with other systems 2. Clearly there are some people who really want this option, and believe there's a "valid reason in a particular circumstance" to turn it off. If we can provide a suitable way to turn this off, then I'll be happy to do that. If someone can suggest some reasonable user interface way of doing it, I'll look into it, probably for the "Advanced" screen only. Rob |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 82
|
Rob, a couple of suggestions:
This information - http://www.joeclark.org/ffaq.html - has been posted a number of times in the forums. Why can't that be used? Secondly, if you don't like that solution, how about letting the user specific the wrap length in Advanced Options? Rob, honestly, this makes all my Fastmail emails look sooooooooooooo awful, this has got to be a priority. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Munic, DE
Posts: 127
|
Re: Looking for a way to disable wrap
Quote:
A mail body ist not designed for doing that. Regards Jochen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,098
Representative of:
Fastmail.FM |
Richard has now added an option (currently on the beta server) to do this.
You have to be in the "Advanced" screen, in Text editing mode, and with the message area set to the "screen width" option (rather than the 72 column option). When you are, you'll see a >> link at the top right of the email. When you click that link, it'll but a flag on the email that will mean that it doesn't wrap when it sends. I like this approach because: 1. It's only something more advanced users will want to use, so it's not something ordinary users will play with not knowing what they're doing 2. If you're editing in 72 column mode, I see no reason you wouldn't want to wrap at 72 columns (eg WYSIWYG) 3. It's a per-email action, so you have to explicitly state for each email that you don't want wrapping, which I think is a good thing because it means "you know what you're doing and are happy with the consequences of this action" Give it a go and let me know what you think. Rob |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 72
|
Quote:
In addition, the current wrap feature doesn't work well with some East Asian languages which don't have a space between words. So I prefer a persistent setting to disable wrapping. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|