View Single Post
Old 21 Nov 2005, 10:57 AM   #3
alexkingorg
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 7
I'm pretty sure the rejection came from FastMail - the sender on the auto-reject message was:

Mail Sieve Subsystem postmaster@messagingengine.com

and the headers from the auto-reject msg show:

Quote:
Received: by server1.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 503) id A9DC7130C01F; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 12:24:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <cmu-sieve-24490-1132507466-0@server1.messagingengine.com>
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=disposition-notification; boundary="24490/server1.messagingengine.com"
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied (rejected)
The multiple X's were actually the recipient's name in the e-mail that was sent. I did as you suggested and sent the same e-mail (went into sent messages, clicked send again) to my FastMail account, but I do not see the spam scores you describe in the header. Perhaps this is because I do not have spam filtering features in my account.

Quote:
Return-Path: <[my sending address]>
Received: from frontend1.internal (frontend1.internal [10.202.2.150])
by server3.messagingengine.com (Cyrus v2.3-alpha) with LMTPA;
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:48:48 -0500
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
X-Resolved-to: [my FastMail address]
X-Delivered-to: [my FastMail address]
X-Mail-from: [my sending address]
X-Sasl-enc: FbgkJ94S3Tomg+lBJOT+1UONscVS61dMGCDVaXvZCRBd 1132541324
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (71-208-175-99.hlrn.qwest.net [71.208.175.99])
by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF2F5713EE
for <[my FastMail address]>; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:48:44 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <3FB54C24-60B3-4140-B772-B5F3F5004B21@[my domain]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
To: [my FastMail address]
From: Alex King <[my sending address]>
Subject: Re: Fastmail.fm
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:48:45 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2)
I'm certainly willing to chalk this up as a blip, but if this becomes common and I don't have a way of "working around" it, I'm going to be a bit frustrated.
alexkingorg is offline   Reply With Quote