View Single Post
Old 30 Aug 2019, 10:40 PM   #5
dbowdley
Cornerstone of the Community
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 549

Representative of:
Runbox.com
Runbox 7 is an open source project and you are welcome to submit feedback, issues and requests for enhancements at:

https://github.com/runbox/runbox7

We are also actively engaged with our customers over on our own community website at:

https://community.runbox.com/c/runbox-7

This is where we will be engaging with customers in the future, and you will find a larger number of our team there.

Regarding the comments here, the poll isn't really useful without people also telling us what they would like to see as part of Runbox 7. I realise it was a binary poll and wasn't necessarily intended to be useful in providing specific feedback.

We appreciate that some people have given more detail than others (thanks for that) and we would welcome more detail regarding the points either on the GitHub site or our own community forum for each of the points so far raised:

• Bad typography/readability.
• Poor navigation/counter-intuitive design.

• Lack of functions (which ones do you want to see included).
• What would make it more aesthetically pleasing to you?


I've investigated the recently raised issue regarding folder counts and we can now work on a fix as those comments were quite specific and helpful.

We are currently working on contacts, calendar, tasks and an identities feature to replace the outdated use of profiles based on folders in the older interface.

As we control the whole development process rather than trying to implement something created by someone else we are in a position to consider any comments made, but we would ask that they give us something to work with rather than just criticise.
dbowdley is offline   Reply With Quote