[Grhm]

Hi, Bron.

Thank you for your reply.

You've provided some detail, and you've explained the reasons why you think things must be so, but it seems to me that you basically agree with me that the accessibility, speed, stability and ergonomics of the new interface are inferior to Classic.

The only thing you dispute (and vehemently so!) is that the new interface has less functionality than Classic.

This surprises me because I had expected it to be the other way round.

The fact that there is a net loss of functionality I thought was uncontroversial.

This thread, and a number of threads linked from it, are full of users lamenting the loss of functions that were important to them in Classic but that don't exist in the new interface.

Are you really saying that those users are all mistaken?